Legal Help After an Autonomous Vehicle Crash

What Sets Etehad Law Apart in Self-Driving Cases

At Etehad Law, we pair broad experience in personal injury law with a genuine understanding of how self-driving technology works. That combination lets us provide effective representation for people injured in these emerging kinds of crashes. We are dedicated to seeking justice for our clients and to protecting their rights throughout the process. What distinguishes our work is a commitment to personalized service. From your first consultation to the resolution of your case, we prioritize clear communication, transparency, and consistent support. Whether your case is resolved through negotiation or litigation, we work hard to pursue fair compensation for your losses. If you're looking for a dependable self-driving car accident attorney, Etehad Law is ready to help. Contact us today to schedule a consultation and learn how we can assist you in navigating this complex and evolving area of the law. Reach out to take the first step toward accountability and recovery.

Wrongful death where the decedent was ejected from a vehicle without wearing a seatbelt.

Day laborer who sustained burns while making repairs to a home, received policy limit.

Low impact collision leading to hospitalization. Client developed pneumonia and died.

A case that involved a minor impact with soft tissue injuries.

Father shot in the shoulder protecting his daughter in a grocery store.

Frequently Asked Questions About Self-Driving Car Accidents

Fault depends on the automation level and what failed. A safety driver who ignored a takeover prompt may be negligent; a sensor or software defect points to the manufacturer under product liability. Often responsibility is shared. Data logs from the vehicle usually show what happened.

Yes, if a defect caused the crash. Under California's strict product liability rule (Greenman v. Yuba Power Products), a maker can be liable for a defective design, manufacturing flaw, or inadequate warning without proof the company was careless — only that the product was unreasonably dangerous.

Yes, under regulation. The DMV licenses autonomous vehicle testing and deployment under Title 13 of the California Code of Regulations (§227.00 and following). Operators must carry insurance and report collisions. A company operating outside those rules gives an injured person added grounds for a claim.

The vehicle's event data — sensor logs, camera feeds, software version, and takeover alerts — is central. This data can be overwritten, so sending a preservation demand quickly matters. We also gather DMV collision reports, maintenance records, and any recall history for the model involved.

Two years from the injury date for personal injury (Code of Civil Procedure §335.1) and three years for property damage (§338). Product liability claims follow the same two-year injury deadline. Acting early helps preserve the electronic data these cases depend on.