HOLLYWOOD BUSINESS LITIGATION LAWYER

Hollywood Business Litigation Lawyer

Most commercial disputes do not turn on what happened. Both sides usually agree on the events. They turn on which legal theory the events fit, and that choice decides the deadline, the remedy and whether a jury ever hears it.

Etehad Law represents businesses, founders and investors in commercial litigation arising in Hollywood and across Los Angeles. The firm's office is on South Rodeo Drive in Beverly Hills.

The firm's managing attorney has been admitted in California since 1996 and its work spans business litigation alongside its injury practice. A first conversation costs nothing.

Free Consultation

Etehad Law represents businesses and individuals in commercial disputes arising in Hollywood. Which claim you bring usually matters more than the facts everyone already agrees on, because the deadlines, the remedies and whether you get a jury all turn on that choice.

Key Takeaways

  • Four years on a written contract, two on an oral one.
  • Breach of fiduciary duty has no settled deadline. It is three or four years depending on how the breach is characterized.
  • Unfair competition claims recover restitution and an injunction. Not damages, and not attorney fees.
  • Trade secret and unfair competition run on opposite clock rules, and they get reversed constantly.
Types of Accidents We Cover
Business litigation lawyer representing Hollywood companies and founders

The Choice of Claim Decides Almost Everything

Take the same set of facts. A partner diverts an opportunity to a company he also owns. That is potentially a breach of contract, a breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, interference with a contract, unfair competition, and misappropriation of a trade secret.

Those six theories carry three different limitation periods, two different accrual rules that run in opposite directions, and at least one that cannot recover damages at all. Choosing among them is the work.

It also runs the other way. A claim that looks dead on its own terms can sometimes survive under a different theory with a longer clock, and a claim that looks strong can carry a remedy that does not include the money you actually lost. Neither of those is obvious from the facts.

How a Matter Is Assessed

The first questions are unromantic. What is in writing, what the written thing actually says about fees and disputes, and what the oldest relevant event is.

That last one drives everything. A dispute that has been simmering for three years has different options from one that surfaced last month, and some doors are already closed before anyone is instructed.

Recent Case Results: $1,000,000

Wrongful death where the decedent was ejected from a vehicle without wearing a seatbelt.

Recent Case Results: $606,000

Day laborer who sustained burns while making repairs to a home, received policy limit.

Recent Case Results: $350,000

Low impact collision leading to hospitalization. Client developed pneumonia and died.

Recent Case Results: $250,000

A case that involved a minor impact with soft tissue injuries.

Recent Case Results: $5,040,000

Father shot in the shoulder protecting his daughter in a grocery store.

The Claims, and What Each One Costs You in Time

Breach of Contract

Four years on a written contract, two on an oral one. The gap is wide enough that the existence of a signed document sometimes decides whether there is a case at all.

Breach of Fiduciary Duty

The elements are a fiduciary relationship, its breach, and damage proximately caused. The deadline is genuinely unsettled. It is four years by default, or three where the breach amounts to actual or constructive fraud, and the Judicial Council's own commentary says it is not clear when a breach becomes constructive fraud for that purpose. Anyone quoting you a single flat number here is being tidier than the law is.

Fraud

Misrepresentation, knowledge of falsity, intent to induce reliance, justifiable reliance, and resulting damage. Three years, and the clock does not start until the aggrieved party discovers the facts constituting the fraud.

Interference With Contract

Where a third party disrupts an existing contract, you do not have to prove the conduct was independently unlawful. Where they interfere with a relationship that has not yet become a contract, you do.

That sounds like a clean division and it is not. In 2020 the California Supreme Court held that interference with an at-will contract also requires an independently wrongful act. A great many commercial arrangements are at-will, so the exception swallows more of the rule than people expect.

One more limit worth knowing: the tort does not lie against a party to the contract itself. You cannot sue your counterparty for interfering with your own agreement.

Unfair Competition

The statute is deliberately broad, reaching any unlawful, unfair or fraudulent business act or practice. Four years, and it does not borrow a shorter deadline from the underlying wrong, so a claim that has expired on its own terms can sometimes still be brought this way.

The catch is the remedy. This claim is equitable. It recovers restitution and an injunction, and it does not recover damages. It does not recover attorney fees either. There is also no jury.

Trade Secrets

Three years from when the misappropriation was discovered or should have been. Note the difference from unfair competition, because the two rules run in opposite directions and get reversed regularly. Continuing misappropriation counts as a single claim accruing at the outset, whereas unfair competition treats each recurring wrong as starting a new period.

Trade secret law also displaces common law claims resting on the same facts, which creates a trap worth naming. If the alternative theories get dismissed as displaced and a jury later decides the information was not a trade secret after all, there is nothing left. The answer is to plead genuinely independent factual bases from the start rather than variations on one story.

Who Pays the Lawyers

California follows the American rule. Each side bears its own costs unless a statute or a contract says otherwise.

Where a contract does provide for fees, the statute makes it reciprocal. Even if the clause is written to benefit only one party, whichever side prevails on the contract recovers, and that reciprocity cannot be waived.

Two refinements that get missed. The reciprocity provision governs mutual prevailing party clauses too, not just one-sided ones. And while it does not reach tort claims, a broadly drafted clause still can under a separate provision. That produces an outcome people do not anticipate: a plaintiff who voluntarily dismisses is protected on the contract claims but can still face a fee award on the tort side.

Hollywood as a Commercial Setting

The businesses here are production companies, post houses, music and recording operations, venues and the hospitality that serves them. Capitol Records has stood at 1750 Vine Street since the 1950s and the district around it still runs on the same trades.

What that means for disputes is a particular shape of problem: work performed on a handshake and a deal memo, revenue that arrives late and in pieces, people who move between competitors carrying relationships and know-how, and contracts that are often terminable at will. That last feature is why the at-will interference rule above matters here more than it would in another industry.

The commercial district itself is managed as a business improvement district, which occasionally matters for disputes over the pavement and frontage outside a business's own door.

Where a Hollywood Case Is Heard

Hollywood is part of the City of Los Angeles, and civil cases arising here are filed downtown at the Stanley Mosk courthouse on North Hill Street, which houses the civil filing window, the complex civil filing window and civil records.

Worth noting the contrast with West Hollywood a short distance away. That is a separate city and its cases go west, to Santa Monica or Beverly Hills. Departments at Stanley Mosk were also renumbered in May 2026, so older guidance naming a specific department is out of date.

This page is provided by Etehad Law for general information only and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. The attorney responsible for this communication is Simon P. Etehad, Esq. (California State Bar No. 186449), Etehad Law, Beverly Hills, California. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Contact Us Today

If a deal, a partner or a former employee has cost your business real money, call Etehad Law for a free case review.

(310) 550-1220

Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Every case is different.

Frequently Asked Questions About Business Disputes

Four years on a written contract, two on an oral one, three for fraud running from discovery, three for trade secrets, four for unfair competition. Breach of fiduciary duty is the awkward one, three or four years depending on how the breach is characterized, and that is genuinely unsettled rather than merely uncertain.
No, but it halves your time. An oral contract carries a two year deadline against four for a written one. Emails, invoices and a course of dealing can still establish terms.
Only if a contract or a statute provides for them. If your contract does, the law makes it reciprocal, so whichever side wins recovers even where the clause was written to protect only the other party, and that reciprocity cannot be contracted away. Note that an unfair competition claim specifically does not recover fees.
Potentially several things at once, and the sequencing matters. Trade secret law displaces common law claims built on the same facts, so if you plead breach of confidence and interference as alternatives they can be struck out as displaced. If a jury then finds the list was not a trade secret, nothing remains. Plead independent factual bases from the outset.
Possibly, and it depends on whether the customer contract was at-will. If it was, you also need to show the conduct was independently wrongful, meaning unlawful by some standard rather than merely aggressive. Most commercial arrangements are at-will, so this bites more often than the textbook division suggests.
Contract, fraud and interference claims do. Unfair competition claims do not, because that claim is equitable and is tried by the judge.
4.9 Based on 267 reviews
Testimonials

Our results speak for themselves

View Our Reviews

I was highly recommonded by several people in reaching out toe Etehad Law, and specficially talk to Simon Etehad who was very personal and thourough in helping me. Now I have so much confidence in his integrity and the way he represents his clients… read more

Kikor D.

I highly recommend Simon Etehad as a personal injury attorney. He is honest, trustworthy, and genuinely cares about his clients. From start to finish, he was professional, responsive, and always took the time to answer questions and explain the… read more

Tania E.

Etehad Law is an incredible firm and Simon Etehad is THE best attorney hands down. From the very beginning, he was professional, responsive, knowledgeable and genuinely cared about my case. He took the time to explain every step of the process,… read more

Kathy D.

Choosing Etehad Law was the best decision I could have made. Dealing with legal issues is usually incredibly stressful, but Simon and his team completely changed the game for me. Right from our first conversation, Simon gave me total peace of mind.… read more

Kochi T.

I had a great experience with Etehad Law from the very first phone call! Everyone I spoke with was friendly, professional, and helpful. From the receptionist to the case manager and the attorney, the entire team made me feel welcome and took the… read more

Lucian

I cannot recommend Etehad law enough! He was beyond amazing throughout my entire car accident case. From the very beginning, he was so understanding, patient, and truly cared about helping me. He explained everything clearly and made sure I felt… read more

Hedi M.

Start Your Free Case Review

Find out if you have a case today.

1

Share what happened

2

We review your case and keep you updated

3

We pursue the result you deserve

Free Consultation · No Fee Unless We Win

Talk to a Hollywood Business Litigation Lawyer

Tell us what happened in 60 seconds. Please complete the form below, and one of our qualified representatives will contact you shortly.

Free Consultation No Recovery, No Fee!

By submitting this form, you consent to receive our newsletter and agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. We respect your privacy and will not share, rent, or sell your email address to third parties.

Thank you. We have your details.

One of our qualified representatives will contact you shortly. If your matter is urgent, please call our office directly.

Call Now(310) 634-0742